Thursday, December 8, 2022
Mitochondrial Health

Is There Evidence for Human Evolution? || Standing For Truth and Jackson Roe

Jackson Roe (Evolutionist) and Standing For Truth (Creationist) discuss human evolution.

Kent Hovind vs. Jackson Roe –
Standing For Truth vs. Jackson Roe –

Standing For Truth Ministries OFFICIAL Website:
Support Standing For Truth:

Interviews Hosted by Standing For Truth:

Debates hosted/moderated by Standing For Truth:


Similar Posts

15 thoughts on “Is There Evidence for Human Evolution? || Standing For Truth and Jackson Roe
  1. Jackson Roe, we are praying for you. You seem like a nice guy. Think about the result of your belief system. Jesus said if you aren't willing to confess Him to men, then he will not confess you to the Father, not a quote btw but you get the idea. This life is so short. Dont focus only on the temporary but on the permanent after death my friend.👍

  2. Thr Deification of scientists and phds is amazing to me. Even the smartest people among us are complete morons compared to all knowledge. People just want an excuse to reject God.

  3. Love watching these debates! I am curious when it come to the DNA side of things about the story of Noah’s birth and how he might have been conceived in a similar way that Jesus was. Would the assumption ( even though he had a normal human wife) that his DNA was fresh or renewed have an effect on how people compare or understand genetics from our past.

  4. Revelation 12:7-8. So long as the dragon fights to stay in heaven, he is
    a restrainer of anything that he does when he is cast to the earth.

    Revelation 12:9-12. Heaven rejoices that the accuser is taken out of the

    Revelation 13:1-2. The beast is revealed.

    Revelation 12:7-8. Restrainer.
    Revelation 12:9-12. Taken out of the way.
    Revelation 13:1-2. Wicked revealed.

    The restrainer is the dragon.

    I have presented this for nearly a year, and have received no Biblical refutation, only vacuous theories.

    But let's try another angle.

    Revelation 13B "…and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority."

    Did that verse say, "…and the evacuation of the church from the planet gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority."

    No. So, why do they teach it? Who do they think that they are?

    I'd like to see a debate on the ID of the restrainer.

    I'd like to see someone align the Scripture to the Scripture as well as I have.

    1. The common teaching is that the restrainer is the Holy Spirit, that will leave with the church. This is written nowhere.
    2. The Bible says that in the latter days the Holy Spirit is poured out, Joel 2:29, not taken away.

    One of those two groups is wrong.

    Be careful. God's plan and God's sovereignty are two different things. They will use one to distract from the other, so long as they fly away.


  5. 2:00

    Lolz if you've never made a category for "Transitional Ape-Human" nor outlined the criteria for it, then of course no fossil will ever fit the category you've never made 🤦🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️

    Oh boy 🤦🏽‍♂️🙄

  6. Why does the Theory for Created Kinds or De Novo Creation not get much traction in Biology?

    Fundamentalist interpretation of the Bible is based on Faith. If it was truth and most of the world accepted it, how much Science, History, and overall Knowledge would be different?

  7. 15:45

    Wait a minute, if you seem know what a Species should be, … why the hell do you argue that Species can't be defined as a counter to when someone points out that "Kinds" can't be defined??

    I'm also interested in learning what definition/s of species you're using and how it's/they're applied.

    And btw, the definition of Species, Genus, Family, etc has nothing to do with common ancestry, so I'm absolutely confused as to your criticism on Neanderthals and Humans being the same or separate species. 🤷🏽‍♂️

  8. 43:00 @Andrew Coming

    Because you can't apply restrictions to the actions of omnipotent beings, you can't argue that said beings "Can't Do" something… else its not omnipotent anymore.

    I can't recall the number of times I've pleaded with people to drop this kind of argumentation 🤦🏽‍♂️

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.